Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Lewiston, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Lewiston, ME.

Data Averill park Lewiston
Population 1,608 38,493
Median Age 53.3 years 39.5 years
Median Income $109,746 $54,317
Married Families 50.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 4% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Lewiston

  • The population in Lewiston is higher at 38,493, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 39.5 years in Lewiston.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $54,317 in Lewiston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Lewiston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lewiston at 11%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate in Averill park is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Lewiston.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Lewiston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Lewiston
Black Data is updating 11
White 100 79
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Lewiston

  • In Lewiston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 79% in Lewiston.
  • In Lewiston, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Averill park.
  • Lewiston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lewiston at 5%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Lewiston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Lewiston
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 13.2%
Depression 23.7% 30.0%
Smoking 15.9% 21.9%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 16.1%
Obesity 34.6% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Lewiston

  • In Lewiston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lewiston at 30.0% versus 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Lewiston has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 16.1% in Lewiston.
  • Lewiston has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lewiston at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Lewiston
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (574)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 19.7% (7,566)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 13.5% (5,195)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 14.4% (5,538)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Lewiston

  • In Lewiston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 19.7% in Lewiston.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lewiston at 13.5%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 14.4% in Lewiston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.