Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Lamesa, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Lamesa, TX.

Data Averill park Lamesa
Population 1,608 8,425
Median Age 53.3 years 33.1 years
Median Income $109,746 $39,434
Married Families 50.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 4% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Lamesa

  • The population in Lamesa is higher at 8,425, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 33.1 years in Lamesa.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $39,434 in Lamesa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 31.0% in Lamesa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lamesa at 18%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • Lamesa has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Lamesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Lamesa
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 5
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 73
Two or More Races Data is updating 19
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Lamesa

  • In Lamesa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 5% in Lamesa.
  • Both Averill park and Lamesa have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Lamesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 73%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lamesa at 19%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Lamesa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Lamesa
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 16.4%
Depression 23.7% 24.0%
Smoking 15.9% 21.6%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 15.6%
Obesity 34.6% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Lamesa

  • In Lamesa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lamesa at 24.0% versus 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Lamesa has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 15.6% in Lamesa.
  • Lamesa has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lamesa at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Lamesa
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.3% (278)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 18.4% (1,547)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 34.2% (2,881)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 8.7% (736)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Lamesa

  • In Lamesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 18.4% in Lamesa.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lamesa at 34.2%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 8.7% in Lamesa.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.