Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Clarkesville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Clarkesville, GA.

Data Averill park Clarkesville
Population 1,608 2,112
Median Age 53.3 years 47.4 years
Median Income $109,746 $64,848
Married Families 50.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 4% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Clarkesville

  • The population in Clarkesville is higher at 2,112, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 47.4 years in Clarkesville.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $64,848 in Clarkesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 30.0% in Clarkesville.
  • Averill park has a higher poverty level at 4% compared to 0% in Clarkesville.
  • The unemployment rate in Averill park is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Clarkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Clarkesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Clarkesville
Black Data is updating 8
White 100 81
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Clarkesville

  • In Clarkesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 81% in Clarkesville.
  • In Clarkesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Averill park.
  • Clarkesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarkesville at 6%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Clarkesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Clarkesville
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 12.6%
Depression 23.7% 23.6%
Smoking 15.9% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 16.3%
Obesity 34.6% 31.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Clarkesville

  • In Clarkesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Averill park at 23.7% compared to 23.6% in Clarkesville.
  • Clarkesville has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 16.3% in Clarkesville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Averill park at 34.6% compared to 31.5% in Clarkesville.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Averill park and Clarkesville at 14.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Clarkesville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (6)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 16.9% (356)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 15.2% (322)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 21.4% (453)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Clarkesville

  • In Clarkesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 16.9% in Clarkesville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarkesville at 15.2%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 21.4% in Clarkesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.