Demographics details for Averill park, NY vs Beaverton, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Averill park, NY vs Beaverton, OR.

Data Averill park Beaverton
Population 1,608 97,053
Median Age 53.3 years 36.7 years
Median Income $109,746 $88,899
Married Families 50.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 4% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.6

Population Comparison: Averill park vs Beaverton

  • The population in Beaverton is higher at 97,053, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • Residents in Averill park have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 36.7 years in Beaverton.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746 compared to $88,899 in Beaverton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Averill park at 50.0% compared to 38.0% in Beaverton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Beaverton at 7%, compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • Beaverton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Averill park vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Averill park Beaverton
Black Data is updating 3
White 100 57
Asian Data is updating 12
Hispanic Data is updating 18
Two or More Races Data is updating 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Averill park vs Beaverton

  • In Beaverton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • Averill park has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
  • In Beaverton, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Averill park.
  • Beaverton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverton at 10%, compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Averill park and Beaverton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Averill park Beaverton
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 9.3%
Depression 23.7% 22.9%
Smoking 15.9% 10.9%
Binge Drinking 21.5% 16.6%
Obesity 34.6% 31.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Averill park vs Beaverton

  • In Beaverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Averill park at 23.7% compared to 22.9% in Beaverton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Averill park at 15.9% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 16.6% in Beaverton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Averill park at 34.6% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Averill park Beaverton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (619)
High School Diploma 22.0% (354) 9.8% (9,471)
Less than High School 3.7% (60) 7.2% (7,010)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.3% (520) 34.9% (33,872)

Education Levels Comparison: Averill park vs Beaverton

  • In Beaverton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Averill park hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverton at 7.2%, compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 32.3% in Averill park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.