Demographics details for Avenal, CA vs Grand prairie, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Avenal, CA vs Grand prairie, TX.
| Data | Avenal | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,374 | 201,843 |
| Median Age | 30.4 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $51,902 | $76,626 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 26% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 9.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Avenal vs Grand prairie
- The population in Grand prairie is higher at 201,843, compared to 13,374 in Avenal.
- The median age in Grand prairie is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 30.4 years in Avenal.
- Grand prairie has a higher median income of $76,626, compared to $51,902 in Avenal.
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Avenal.
- Avenal has a higher poverty level at 26% compared to 14% in Grand prairie.
- The unemployment rate in Avenal is higher at 9.5%, compared to 4.5% in Grand prairie.
Demographics
Demographics Avenal vs Grand prairie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Avenal | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 23 |
| White | -6 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 85 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Avenal vs Grand prairie
- In Grand prairie, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 4% in Avenal.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand prairie at 9% compared to -6% in Avenal.
- In Grand prairie, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Avenal.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Avenal at 85% compared to 46% in Grand prairie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Avenal at 15% compared to 14% in Grand prairie.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Avenal and Grand prairie at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Avenal | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 18.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.6% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Avenal vs Grand prairie
- More residents in Avenal report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.5% in Grand prairie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand prairie at 21.4% versus 17.6% in Avenal.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Avenal at 21.7% compared to 16.1% in Grand prairie.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand prairie at 17.3% compared to 15.4% in Avenal.
- Obesity rates are higher in Avenal at 40.2% compared to 34.9% in Grand prairie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand prairie at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Avenal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Avenal | Grand prairie |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (327) | 2.2% (4,493) |
| High School Diploma | 10.6% (1,415) | 12.9% (26,069) |
| Less than High School | 61.0% (8,153) | 21.3% (43,014) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 3.5% (473) | 16.4% (33,151) |
Education Levels Comparison: Avenal vs Grand prairie
- A higher percentage of residents in Avenal have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 2.2% in Grand prairie.
- In Grand prairie, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.9% compared to 10.6% in Avenal.
- More residents in Avenal have less than a high school education at 61.0% compared to 21.3% in Grand prairie.
- In Grand prairie, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 3.5% in Avenal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.