Demographics details for Austin, PA vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Austin, PA vs Fort valley, GA.
| Data | Austin | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 474 | 8,838 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 30.6 years |
| Median Income | $42,708 | $31,807 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 18.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Austin vs Fort valley
- The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 474 in Austin.
- Residents in Austin have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Austin has a higher median income of $42,708 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Austin at 56.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Austin.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Austin and Fort valley at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Austin vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Austin | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 70 |
| White | 99 | 18 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Austin vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Austin.
- Austin has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- Both Austin and Fort valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Austin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort valley at 4%, compared to 1% in Austin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Austin and Fort valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Austin | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Austin vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.0% in Austin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Austin at 25.0% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 21.1% in Austin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Austin at 19.0% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 38.4% in Austin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Austin at 27.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Austin | Fort valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (4) | 3.0% (267) |
| High School Diploma | 41.4% (196) | 13.9% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (82) | 17.3% (1,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.3% (25) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Austin vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in Austin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Austin hold a high school diploma at 41.4% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 17.3%.
- In Fort valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 5.3% in Austin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.