Demographics details for Aurora, IL vs Sylvania, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aurora, IL vs Sylvania, GA.
| Data | Aurora | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 177,866 | 2,602 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $85,943 | $36,682 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Aurora vs Sylvania
- In Aurora, the population is higher at 177,866, compared to 2,602 in Sylvania.
- The median age in Sylvania is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Aurora.
- Aurora has a higher median income of $85,943 compared to $36,682 in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Aurora at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Sylvania.
- The poverty level is higher in Sylvania at 18%, compared to 12% in Aurora.
- The unemployment rate in Aurora is higher at 6.0%, compared to 5.2% in Sylvania.
Demographics
Demographics Aurora vs Sylvania provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aurora | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 57 |
| White | 17 | 40 |
| Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 43 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aurora vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 11% in Aurora.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sylvania at 40% compared to 17% in Aurora.
- The Asian population is larger in Aurora at 11% compared to 0% in Sylvania.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Aurora at 43% compared to 1% in Sylvania.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Aurora at 17% compared to 2% in Sylvania.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Aurora at 1% compared to 0% in Sylvania.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aurora | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 40.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aurora vs Sylvania
- In Sylvania, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.0% in Aurora.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sylvania at 21.8% versus 17.8% in Aurora.
- Sylvania has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 15.0% in Aurora.
- Binge drinking is more common in Aurora at 15.8% compared to 13.6% in Sylvania.
- Sylvania has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 36.8% in Aurora.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sylvania at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Aurora.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aurora | Sylvania |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (4,323) | 0.3% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 11.5% (20,384) | 27.1% (704) |
| Less than High School | 22.9% (40,725) | 18.6% (485) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.7% (40,403) | 10.4% (271) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aurora vs Sylvania
- A higher percentage of residents in Aurora have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.3% in Sylvania.
- In Sylvania, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 11.5% in Aurora.
- More residents in Aurora have less than a high school education at 22.9% compared to 18.6% in Sylvania.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aurora hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 10.4% in Sylvania.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.