Demographics details for Aulander, NC vs Schenectady, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aulander, NC vs Schenectady, NY.
| Data | Aulander | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 727 | 68,809 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $54,650 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Aulander vs Schenectady
- The population in Schenectady is higher at 68,809, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- Residents in Aulander have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 36.0 years in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has a higher median income of $54,650, compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Schenectady.
- The unemployment rate in Aulander is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.6% in Schenectady.
Demographics
Demographics Aulander vs Schenectady provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aulander | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 20 |
| White | 38 | 47 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aulander vs Schenectady
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aulander at 61% compared to 20% in Schenectady.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Schenectady at 47% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- In Schenectady, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Aulander.
- Schenectady has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 1% in Aulander.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aulander | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 39.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aulander vs Schenectady
- More residents in Aulander report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.4% in Schenectady.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Schenectady at 24.0% versus 23.5% in Aulander.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aulander at 23.9% compared to 22.7% in Schenectady.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Schenectady at 16.2% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aulander at 44.9% compared to 39.6% in Schenectady.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Schenectady.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aulander | Schenectady |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.7% (1,194) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (97) | 15.3% (10,540) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (207) | 14.7% (10,146) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (21) | 15.0% (10,303) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aulander vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- In Schenectady, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- More residents in Aulander have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 14.7% in Schenectady.
- In Schenectady, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.