Demographics details for Aulander, NC vs London, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aulander, NC vs London, KY.
Data | Aulander | London |
---|---|---|
Population | 727 | 7,578 |
Median Age | 42.4 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $33,250 | $45,858 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Aulander vs London
- The population in London is higher at 7,578, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- Residents in Aulander have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 39.5 years in London.
- London has a higher median income of $45,858, compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- In London, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in London.
- The unemployment rate in Aulander is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.8% in London.
Demographics
Demographics Aulander vs London provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Aulander | London |
---|---|---|
Black | 61 | 2 |
White | 38 | 93 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aulander vs London
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aulander at 61% compared to 2% in London.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in London at 93% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- In London, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Aulander.
- London has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in London at 2%, compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aulander and London at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Aulander | London |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 16.0% |
Depression | 23.5% | 29.0% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 44.9% | 46.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aulander vs London
- In London, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.2% in Aulander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in London at 29.0% versus 23.5% in Aulander.
- London has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 23.9% in Aulander.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in London at 14.8% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- London has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 44.9% in Aulander.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in London at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Aulander.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Aulander | London |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.2% (93) |
High School Diploma | 13.3% (97) | 19.7% (1,496) |
Less than High School | 28.5% (207) | 18.6% (1,409) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (21) | 11.9% (900) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aulander vs London
- In London, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- In London, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.7% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- More residents in Aulander have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 18.6% in London.
- In London, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.