Demographics details for Aulander, NC vs Farmington, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aulander, NC vs Farmington, WV.
| Data | Aulander | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 727 | 397 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $54,750 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Aulander vs Farmington
- In Aulander, the population is higher at 727, compared to 397 in Farmington.
- Residents in Aulander have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $54,750, compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Aulander is higher at 6.1%, compared to 5.0% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Aulander vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aulander | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | Data is updating |
| White | 38 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aulander vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aulander at 61% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- Both Aulander and Farmington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Aulander and Farmington at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Aulander at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aulander and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aulander | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 28.3% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aulander vs Farmington
- In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 19.2% in Aulander.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 23.5% in Aulander.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 23.9% in Aulander.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 14.9% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aulander at 44.9% compared to 39.5% in Farmington.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Aulander and Farmington at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aulander | Farmington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (97) | 31.5% (125) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (207) | 8.1% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (21) | 9.8% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aulander vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Aulander have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 13.3% in Aulander.
- More residents in Aulander have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 8.1% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.