Demographics details for Aulander, NC vs Fair oaks, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aulander, NC vs Fair oaks, CA.
| Data | Aulander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 727 | 32,754 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $112,138 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Aulander vs Fair oaks
- The population in Fair oaks is higher at 32,754, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- The median age in Fair oaks is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 42.4 years in Aulander.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138, compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Aulander is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.5% in Fair oaks.
Demographics
Demographics Aulander vs Fair oaks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aulander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 2 |
| White | 38 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Aulander vs Fair oaks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aulander at 61% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fair oaks at 68% compared to 38% in Aulander.
- In Fair oaks, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Aulander.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fair oaks at 10%, compared to 1% in Aulander.
- In Fair oaks, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aulander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aulander vs Fair oaks
- More residents in Aulander report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aulander at 23.5% compared to 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aulander at 23.9% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aulander at 44.9% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aulander | Fair oaks |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.0% (312) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (97) | 9.5% (3,112) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (207) | 4.9% (1,601) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (21) | 35.4% (11,579) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aulander vs Fair oaks
- In Fair oaks, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aulander hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- More residents in Aulander have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- In Fair oaks, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.