Demographics details for Aulander, NC vs Carrollton, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Aulander, NC vs Carrollton, TX.
| Data | Aulander | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 727 | 133,820 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $33,250 | $95,380 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Aulander vs Carrollton
- The population in Carrollton is higher at 133,820, compared to 727 in Aulander.
- Residents in Aulander have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 38.6 years in Carrollton.
- Carrollton has a higher median income of $95,380, compared to $33,250 in Aulander.
- In Carrollton, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 23.0% in Aulander.
- Aulander has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Carrollton.
- The unemployment rate in Aulander is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.7% in Carrollton.
Demographics
Demographics Aulander vs Carrollton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Aulander | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 10 |
| White | 38 | 31 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 15 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Aulander vs Carrollton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Aulander at 61% compared to 10% in Carrollton.
- Aulander has a higher percentage of White residents at 38% compared to 31% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 0% in Aulander.
- Carrollton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 0% in Aulander.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carrollton at 12%, compared to 1% in Aulander.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Aulander and Carrollton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Aulander | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 23.9% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 44.9% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Aulander vs Carrollton
- More residents in Aulander report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.1% in Carrollton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Aulander at 23.5% compared to 20.9% in Carrollton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Aulander at 23.9% compared to 13.5% in Carrollton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carrollton at 17.7% compared to 14.2% in Aulander.
- Obesity rates are higher in Aulander at 44.9% compared to 31.5% in Carrollton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Aulander at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Carrollton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Aulander | Carrollton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.6% (2,169) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (97) | 12.3% (16,432) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (207) | 13.2% (17,673) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.9% (21) | 29.8% (39,921) |
Education Levels Comparison: Aulander vs Carrollton
- In Carrollton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Aulander.
- A higher percentage of residents in Aulander hold a high school diploma at 13.3% compared to 12.3% in Carrollton.
- More residents in Aulander have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 13.2% in Carrollton.
- In Carrollton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.8% compared to 2.9% in Aulander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.