Demographics details for Augusta, KY vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Augusta, KY vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Augusta | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,098 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,135 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Augusta vs Port gibson
- The population in Port gibson is higher at 1,206, compared to 1,098 in Augusta.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 36.4 years in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher median income of $50,135 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Augusta at 41.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 10% in Augusta.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.5% in Augusta.
Demographics
Demographics Augusta vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Augusta | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 82 |
| White | 86 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
| American Indian | 12 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Augusta vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 2% in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Augusta and Port gibson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Augusta and Port gibson at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 0% in Augusta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Augusta at 12% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Augusta | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 28.9% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Augusta vs Port gibson
- More residents in Augusta report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Augusta at 28.9% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 24.3% in Augusta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Augusta at 15.3% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 38.1% in Augusta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Augusta at 24.0% compared to 23.0% in Port gibson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Augusta | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (5) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 33.2% (365) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 18.9% (208) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.3% (267) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Augusta vs Port gibson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Augusta and Port gibson at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Augusta hold a high school diploma at 33.2% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Augusta have less than a high school education at 18.9% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Augusta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.3% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.