Demographics details for Augusta, GA vs Grand island, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Augusta, GA vs Grand island, NE.
Data | Augusta | Grand island |
---|---|---|
Population | 202,096 | 52,513 |
Median Age | 34.6 years | 35.0 years |
Median Income | $50,492 | $59,061 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Augusta vs Grand island
- In Augusta, the population is higher at 202,096, compared to 52,513 in Grand island.
- The median age in Grand island is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 34.6 years in Augusta.
- Grand island has a higher median income of $59,061, compared to $50,492 in Augusta.
- In Grand island, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 25.0% in Augusta.
- Augusta has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Grand island.
- The unemployment rate in Augusta is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Grand island.
Demographics
Demographics Augusta vs Grand island provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Augusta | Grand island |
---|---|---|
Black | 56 | 4 |
White | 31 | 52 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Augusta vs Grand island
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Augusta at 56% compared to 4% in Grand island.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand island at 52% compared to 31% in Augusta.
- The Asian population is larger in Augusta at 2% compared to 1% in Grand island.
- Grand island has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 5% in Augusta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand island at 8%, compared to 6% in Augusta.
- In Grand island, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Augusta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Augusta | Grand island |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.8% |
Depression | 21.6% | 17.0% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 41.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Augusta vs Grand island
- More residents in Augusta report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Grand island.
- Depression is more prevalent in Augusta at 21.6% compared to 17.0% in Grand island.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Augusta at 20.6% compared to 16.8% in Grand island.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand island at 18.2% compared to 14.7% in Augusta.
- Grand island has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 40.3% in Augusta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Augusta at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Grand island.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Augusta | Grand island |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (1,539) | 2.8% (1,457) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (34,505) | 16.6% (8,733) |
Less than High School | 10.8% (21,758) | 20.3% (10,649) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (31,482) | 13.3% (6,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Augusta vs Grand island
- In Grand island, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.8% in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Augusta hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Grand island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand island at 20.3%, compared to 10.8% in Augusta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Augusta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 13.3% in Grand island.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.