Demographics details for Auburn, GA vs Spring city, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, GA vs Spring city, TN.
| Data | Auburn | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,865 | 1,949 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $77,896 | $36,190 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Spring city
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 8,865, compared to 1,949 in Spring city.
- The median age in Spring city is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 33.1 years in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher median income of $77,896 compared to $36,190 in Spring city.
- In Spring city, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Spring city at 11%, compared to 8% in Auburn.
- Spring city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.1% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Spring city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Auburn | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 4 |
| White | 64 | 91 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 15 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Spring city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Auburn at 8% compared to 4% in Spring city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring city at 91% compared to 64% in Auburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 5% compared to 0% in Spring city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Auburn at 15% compared to 2% in Spring city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Auburn at 7% compared to 3% in Spring city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Auburn at 1% compared to 0% in Spring city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Auburn | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Spring city
- In Spring city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.7% in Auburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spring city at 29.5% versus 23.2% in Auburn.
- Spring city has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 19.6% in Auburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Auburn at 16.5% compared to 15.1% in Spring city.
- Spring city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 38.4% in Auburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spring city at 30.0% compared to 10.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Auburn | Spring city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (143) | 1.1% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 15.9% (1,413) | 28.7% (559) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (1,320) | 27.3% (532) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.6% (765) | 12.0% (233) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Spring city
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Spring city.
- In Spring city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 15.9% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spring city at 27.3%, compared to 14.9% in Auburn.
- In Spring city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.6% in Auburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.