Demographics details for Auburn, AL vs Sherwood, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, AL vs Sherwood, OH.
| Data | Auburn | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,006 | 3,408 |
| Median Age | 25.9 years | 47.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,509 | $140,788 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Sherwood
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 80,006, compared to 3,408 in Sherwood.
- The median age in Sherwood is higher at 47.1 years, compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $140,788, compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- In Sherwood, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Sherwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Auburn | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | Data is updating |
| White | 69 | 91 |
| Asian | 8 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Auburn at 17% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sherwood at 91% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 8% compared to 4% in Sherwood.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Auburn at 3% compared to 2% in Sherwood.
- Both Auburn and Sherwood have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Auburn and Sherwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Auburn | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 22.8% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Sherwood
- More residents in Auburn report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.3% in Sherwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Auburn at 22.0% compared to 21.8% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Auburn at 15.5% compared to 12.7% in Sherwood.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sherwood at 22.8% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Auburn at 38.7% compared to 29.9% in Sherwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Auburn at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Sherwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Auburn | Sherwood |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (236) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (4,206) | 12.1% (412) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,964) | 1.5% (52) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (24,546) | 41.3% (1,408) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Sherwood
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Auburn have less than a high school education at 2.5% compared to 1.5% in Sherwood.
- In Sherwood, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 30.7% in Auburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.