Demographics details for Auburn, AL vs Panama city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, AL vs Panama city, FL.
| Data | Auburn | Panama city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,006 | 34,690 |
| Median Age | 25.9 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,509 | $57,221 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Panama city
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 80,006, compared to 34,690 in Panama city.
- The median age in Panama city is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Panama city has a higher median income of $57,221, compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Auburn and Panama city at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Panama city at 12%, compared to 10% in Auburn.
- Panama city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Panama city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Auburn | Panama city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 21 |
| White | 69 | 61 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Panama city
- In Panama city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 17% in Auburn.
- Auburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 61% in Panama city.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 8% compared to 1% in Panama city.
- Panama city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Panama city at 8%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- In Panama city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Auburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Auburn | Panama city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 33.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Panama city
- In Panama city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.6% in Auburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Auburn at 22.0% compared to 21.8% in Panama city.
- Panama city has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Panama city at 15.8% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Auburn at 38.7% compared to 33.6% in Panama city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panama city at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Auburn | Panama city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (236) | 1.1% (395) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (4,206) | 15.6% (5,413) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,964) | 11.3% (3,914) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (24,546) | 17.4% (6,028) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Panama city
- In Panama city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- In Panama city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panama city at 11.3%, compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 17.4% in Panama city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.