Demographics details for Auburn, AL vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, AL vs Gibsonburg, OH.
| Data | Auburn | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,006 | 2,436 |
| Median Age | 25.9 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $55,509 | $67,279 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Gibsonburg
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 80,006, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is identical in both Auburn and Gibsonburg at 10%.
- Gibsonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Auburn | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 79 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Auburn at 17% compared to 2% in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 8% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Auburn and Gibsonburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Auburn | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Gibsonburg
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Auburn and Gibsonburg at 17.6%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gibsonburg at 23.0% versus 22.0% in Auburn.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 15.5% in Auburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 38.7% in Auburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gibsonburg at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Auburn | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (236) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (4,206) | 35.6% (867) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,964) | 5.1% (125) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (24,546) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gibsonburg at 5.1%, compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.