Demographics details for Auburn, AL vs Brookings, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Auburn, AL vs Brookings, SD.
| Data | Auburn | Brookings |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 80,006 | 23,993 |
| Median Age | 25.9 years | 24.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,509 | $57,824 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Auburn vs Brookings
- In Auburn, the population is higher at 80,006, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
- Residents in Auburn have a higher median age of 25.9 years compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher median income of $57,824, compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Auburn at 32.0% compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- The poverty level is higher in Brookings at 12%, compared to 10% in Auburn.
- The unemployment rate in Auburn is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Auburn vs Brookings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Auburn | Brookings |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 84 |
| Asian | 8 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Auburn vs Brookings
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Auburn at 17% compared to 2% in Brookings.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brookings at 84% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Auburn at 8% compared to 4% in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brookings at 4%, compared to 3% in Auburn.
- In Brookings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Auburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Auburn | Brookings |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 15.5% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Auburn vs Brookings
- More residents in Auburn report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Depression is more prevalent in Auburn at 22.0% compared to 18.7% in Brookings.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Auburn at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Brookings.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Auburn at 38.7% compared to 34.2% in Brookings.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brookings at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Auburn | Brookings |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (236) | 0.2% (58) |
| High School Diploma | 5.3% (4,206) | 7.7% (1,837) |
| Less than High School | 2.5% (1,964) | 3.4% (822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (24,546) | 23.1% (5,531) |
Education Levels Comparison: Auburn vs Brookings
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- In Brookings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.7% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brookings at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Auburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 23.1% in Brookings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.