Environment details: Attica KS
Moderate quality; consistency needed.
Environment details: Scott city MO
Fair quality; generally safe.
Compare Environment: Attica KS vs Scott city MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Attica | Scott city |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 478 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Moderate quality; consistency needed. | Fair quality; generally safe. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.78 | 1.71 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 33 | 38 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Attica vs Scott city
- The water quality in Scott city is superior at 6/10 compared to 5/10 in Attica.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- The average air quality index is worse in Attica with 1.78 compared to 1.71 in Scott city.
- Scott city experiences more days with poor air quality at 38 compared to 33 in Attica.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.