Demographics details for Atoka, OK vs Garrison, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Atoka, OK vs Garrison, KY.
Data | Atoka | Garrison |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,200 | 888 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 55.7 years |
Median Income | $40,362 | $40,156 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Atoka vs Garrison
- In Atoka, the population is higher at 3,200, compared to 888 in Garrison.
- The median age in Garrison is higher at 55.7 years, compared to 37.5 years in Atoka.
- Atoka has a higher median income of $40,362 compared to $40,156 in Garrison.
- In Garrison, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 32.0% in Atoka.
- Atoka has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Garrison.
- The unemployment rate in Atoka is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Garrison.
Demographics
Demographics Atoka vs Garrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Atoka | Garrison |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 55 | 100 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 17 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 14 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Atoka vs Garrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Atoka at 4% compared to 0% in Garrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Garrison at 100% compared to 55% in Atoka.
- The Asian population is larger in Atoka at 3% compared to 0% in Garrison.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Atoka at 7% compared to 0% in Garrison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Atoka at 17% compared to 0% in Garrison.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Atoka at 14% compared to 0% in Garrison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Atoka | Garrison |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.8% |
Depression | 27.8% | 30.5% |
Smoking | 27.8% | 26.0% |
Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 15.3% |
Obesity | 43.5% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Atoka vs Garrison
- More residents in Atoka report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 21.0% in Garrison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Garrison at 30.5% versus 27.8% in Atoka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Atoka at 27.8% compared to 26.0% in Garrison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Garrison at 15.3% compared to 12.8% in Atoka.
- Obesity rates are higher in Atoka at 43.5% compared to 39.9% in Garrison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Atoka at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Garrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Atoka | Garrison |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (39) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.5% (623) | 19.3% (171) |
Less than High School | 24.2% (776) | 50.9% (452) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (291) | 3.6% (32) |
Education Levels Comparison: Atoka vs Garrison
- A higher percentage of residents in Atoka have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Garrison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atoka hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 19.3% in Garrison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garrison at 50.9%, compared to 24.2% in Atoka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atoka hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 3.6% in Garrison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.