Demographics details for Atlanta, GA vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Atlanta, GA vs Maple valley, WA.
Data | Atlanta | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 499,127 | 28,220 |
Median Age | 33.6 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $77,655 | $137,595 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Atlanta vs Maple valley
- In Atlanta, the population is higher at 499,127, compared to 28,220 in Maple valley.
- The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 33.6 years in Atlanta.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $77,655 in Atlanta.
- In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 24.0% in Atlanta.
- Atlanta has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Atlanta.
Demographics
Demographics Atlanta vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Atlanta | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 47 | 2 |
White | 38 | 74 |
Asian | 5 | 11 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Atlanta vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Atlanta at 47% compared to 2% in Maple valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple valley at 74% compared to 38% in Atlanta.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 5% in Atlanta.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Atlanta and Maple valley at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 5% in Atlanta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Atlanta and Maple valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Atlanta | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.3% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 8.6% |
Depression | 17.6% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 24.3% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Atlanta vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.3% in Atlanta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 17.6% in Atlanta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Atlanta at 15.7% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 15.6% in Atlanta.
- Obesity rates are higher in Atlanta at 32.5% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Atlanta at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Atlanta | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (3,457) | 0.4% (103) |
High School Diploma | 10.1% (50,403) | 10.2% (2,878) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (28,749) | 3.1% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.4% (196,733) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Atlanta vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Atlanta have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.2% compared to 10.1% in Atlanta.
- More residents in Atlanta have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atlanta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.4% compared to 28.5% in Maple valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.