Demographics details for Atkinson, NC vs Fairhope, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Atkinson, NC vs Fairhope, AL.
| Data | Atkinson | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 322 | 23,859 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 44.9 years |
| Median Income | $46,250 | $85,456 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairhope
- The population in Fairhope is higher at 23,859, compared to 322 in Atkinson.
- The median age in Fairhope is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Atkinson.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456, compared to $46,250 in Atkinson.
- In Fairhope, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 38.0% in Atkinson.
- Atkinson has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Atkinson is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Atkinson vs Fairhope provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Atkinson | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 4 |
| White | 44 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Atkinson at 19% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairhope at 89% compared to 44% in Atkinson.
- In Fairhope, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Atkinson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Atkinson at 31% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Atkinson at 6% compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Atkinson and Fairhope at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Atkinson | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairhope
- More residents in Atkinson report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Depression is more prevalent in Atkinson at 26.0% compared to 22.6% in Fairhope.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Atkinson at 20.1% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Atkinson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Atkinson at 36.2% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- Disability percentages are higher in Atkinson at 27.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Atkinson | Fairhope |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (7) | 0.3% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 35.1% (113) | 7.1% (1,686) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (41) | 4.6% (1,098) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (22) | 35.8% (8,552) |
Education Levels Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairhope
- A higher percentage of residents in Atkinson have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atkinson hold a high school diploma at 35.1% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- More residents in Atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- In Fairhope, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 6.8% in Atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.