Demographics details for Atkinson, IL vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Atkinson, IL vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Atkinson | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 939 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 44.6 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $51,593 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 939 in Atkinson.
- Residents in Atkinson have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher median income of $67,245, compared to $51,593 in Atkinson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Atkinson at 42.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 7% in Atkinson.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Atkinson vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Atkinson | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 73 |
| White | 91 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 0% in Atkinson.
- Atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Atkinson and Fairburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Atkinson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Atkinson at 8% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Atkinson and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Atkinson | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairburn
- More residents in Atkinson report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Atkinson at 21.6% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Atkinson at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Atkinson at 18.8% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Atkinson at 35.0% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Atkinson at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Atkinson | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (8) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 36.4% (342) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (125) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (79) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Atkinson vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Atkinson have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atkinson hold a high school diploma at 36.4% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Atkinson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 8.4% in Atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.