Demographics details for Atascadero, CA vs Edgefield, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Atascadero, CA vs Edgefield, SC.
Data | Atascadero | Edgefield |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,684 | 26,932 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $88,984 | $60,033 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Atascadero vs Edgefield
- In Atascadero, the population is higher at 29,684, compared to 26,932 in Edgefield.
- The median age in Edgefield is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 40.9 years in Atascadero.
- Atascadero has a higher median income of $88,984 compared to $60,033 in Edgefield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Atascadero at 44.0% compared to 38.0% in Edgefield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Atascadero and Edgefield at 13%.
- Edgefield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.6% in Atascadero.
Demographics
Demographics Atascadero vs Edgefield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Atascadero | Edgefield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 32 |
White | 62 | 56 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 22 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Atascadero vs Edgefield
- In Edgefield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 1% in Atascadero.
- Atascadero has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 56% in Edgefield.
- The Asian population is larger in Atascadero at 4% compared to 0% in Edgefield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Atascadero at 22% compared to 7% in Edgefield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Atascadero at 10% compared to 5% in Edgefield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Atascadero at 1% compared to 0% in Edgefield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Atascadero | Edgefield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 13.1% |
Depression | 19.6% | 20.3% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 29.8% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Atascadero vs Edgefield
- In Edgefield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.7% in Atascadero.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edgefield at 20.3% versus 19.6% in Atascadero.
- Edgefield has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 11.8% in Atascadero.
- Binge drinking is more common in Atascadero at 19.6% compared to 16.5% in Edgefield.
- Edgefield has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 29.8% in Atascadero.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Edgefield at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Atascadero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Atascadero | Edgefield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (177) | 0.7% (199) |
High School Diploma | 14.1% (4,194) | 19.2% (5,180) |
Less than High School | 8.4% (2,501) | 18.3% (4,938) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (6,240) | 14.1% (3,798) |
Education Levels Comparison: Atascadero vs Edgefield
- In Edgefield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Atascadero.
- In Edgefield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 14.1% in Atascadero.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edgefield at 18.3%, compared to 8.4% in Atascadero.
- A higher percentage of residents in Atascadero hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 14.1% in Edgefield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.