Demographics details for Ashtabula, OH vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashtabula, OH vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Ashtabula | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,806 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $39,053 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Ashtabula vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 17,806 in Ashtabula.
- Residents in Ashtabula have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418, compared to $39,053 in Ashtabula.
- In Shafter, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Ashtabula.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ashtabula and Shafter at 20%.
- The unemployment rate in Ashtabula is higher at 5.3%, compared to 5.1% in Shafter.
Demographics
Demographics Ashtabula vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashtabula | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 2 |
| White | 69 | -9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ashtabula vs Shafter
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashtabula at 9% compared to 2% in Shafter.
- Ashtabula has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ashtabula.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 13% in Ashtabula.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 9% in Ashtabula.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ashtabula.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashtabula | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 30.0% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 48.1% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashtabula vs Shafter
- More residents in Ashtabula report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.8% in Shafter.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashtabula at 27.7% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashtabula at 30.0% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashtabula at 16.4% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashtabula at 48.1% compared to 39.4% in Shafter.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashtabula at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashtabula | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (389) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 26.3% (4,691) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 25.4% (4,526) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (1,468) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashtabula vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.2% in Ashtabula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashtabula hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 14.1% in Shafter.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 25.4% in Ashtabula.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashtabula hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.