Demographics details for Ashtabula, OH vs Little rock, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashtabula, OH vs Little rock, AR.
Data | Ashtabula | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,806 | 202,864 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $39,053 | $58,697 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Ashtabula vs Little rock
- The population in Little rock is higher at 202,864, compared to 17,806 in Ashtabula.
- Residents in Ashtabula have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 36.6 years in Little rock.
- Little rock has a higher median income of $58,697, compared to $39,053 in Ashtabula.
- In Little rock, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Ashtabula.
- Ashtabula has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 14% in Little rock.
- The unemployment rate in Ashtabula is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.7% in Little rock.
Demographics
Demographics Ashtabula vs Little rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ashtabula | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 41 |
White | 69 | 44 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashtabula vs Little rock
- In Little rock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 9% in Ashtabula.
- Ashtabula has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 44% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Ashtabula.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ashtabula at 13% compared to 8% in Little rock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ashtabula at 9% compared to 4% in Little rock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashtabula and Little rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ashtabula | Little rock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.0% |
Depression | 27.7% | 21.9% |
Smoking | 30.0% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 48.1% | 39.0% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashtabula vs Little rock
- More residents in Ashtabula report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 16.9% in Little rock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashtabula at 27.7% compared to 21.9% in Little rock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashtabula at 30.0% compared to 19.0% in Little rock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashtabula at 16.4% compared to 12.9% in Little rock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashtabula at 48.1% compared to 39.0% in Little rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashtabula at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Little rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ashtabula | Little rock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.2% (389) | 0.7% (1,359) |
High School Diploma | 26.3% (4,691) | 12.2% (24,667) |
Less than High School | 25.4% (4,526) | 7.3% (14,766) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (1,468) | 29.4% (59,641) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashtabula vs Little rock
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashtabula have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.7% in Little rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashtabula hold a high school diploma at 26.3% compared to 12.2% in Little rock.
- More residents in Ashtabula have less than a high school education at 25.4% compared to 7.3% in Little rock.
- In Little rock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 8.2% in Ashtabula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.