Demographics details for Ashland, OH vs Two rivers, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashland, OH vs Two rivers, WI.
| Data | Ashland | Two rivers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,015 | 11,166 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 44.7 years |
| Median Income | $56,040 | $56,236 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Ashland vs Two rivers
- In Ashland, the population is higher at 19,015, compared to 11,166 in Two rivers.
- The median age in Two rivers is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 38.8 years in Ashland.
- Two rivers has a higher median income of $56,236, compared to $56,040 in Ashland.
- In Two rivers, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Ashland.
- The poverty level is identical in both Ashland and Two rivers at 11%.
- The unemployment rate in Ashland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Two rivers.
Demographics
Demographics Ashland vs Two rivers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashland | Two rivers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 91 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashland vs Two rivers
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ashland and Two rivers at 2%.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 86% in Two rivers.
- Both Ashland and Two rivers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Two rivers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Two rivers at 5%, compared to 4% in Ashland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashland and Two rivers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashland | Two rivers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 23.7% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashland vs Two rivers
- More residents in Ashland report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.7% in Two rivers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashland at 24.6% compared to 24.3% in Two rivers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashland at 20.6% compared to 18.0% in Two rivers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Two rivers at 23.7% compared to 18.1% in Ashland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashland at 38.7% compared to 36.7% in Two rivers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashland at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Two rivers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashland | Two rivers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (28) | 0.7% (83) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (4,380) | 24.6% (2,745) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (2,337) | 8.7% (974) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (3,160) | 17.1% (1,912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashland vs Two rivers
- In Two rivers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Ashland.
- In Two rivers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 23.0% in Ashland.
- More residents in Ashland have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 8.7% in Two rivers.
- In Two rivers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.