Demographics details for Ashland, OH vs Spartanburg, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashland, OH vs Spartanburg, SC.
| Data | Ashland | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,015 | 38,584 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.5 years |
| Median Income | $56,040 | $49,140 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Ashland vs Spartanburg
- The population in Spartanburg is higher at 38,584, compared to 19,015 in Ashland.
- Residents in Ashland have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.5 years in Spartanburg.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $56,040 compared to $49,140 in Spartanburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashland at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Spartanburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Spartanburg at 15%, compared to 11% in Ashland.
- Spartanburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Ashland vs Spartanburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashland | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 45 |
| White | 91 | 44 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashland vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 44% in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Ashland.
- Spartanburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Ashland.
- Both Ashland and Spartanburg have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashland and Spartanburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashland | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashland vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Ashland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashland at 24.6% compared to 22.9% in Spartanburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashland at 20.6% compared to 20.1% in Spartanburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashland at 18.1% compared to 13.8% in Spartanburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashland at 38.7% compared to 38.5% in Spartanburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashland at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Spartanburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashland | Spartanburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (28) | 1.0% (384) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (4,380) | 15.9% (6,118) |
| Less than High School | 12.3% (2,337) | 11.2% (4,339) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (3,160) | 21.3% (8,205) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashland vs Spartanburg
- In Spartanburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 15.9% in Spartanburg.
- More residents in Ashland have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 11.2% in Spartanburg.
- In Spartanburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 16.6% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.