Demographics details for Ashland, OH vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashland, OH vs Clarksville, AR.
Data | Ashland | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Population | 19,015 | 9,555 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $56,040 | $35,911 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ashland vs Clarksville
- In Ashland, the population is higher at 19,015, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Ashland have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $56,040 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashland at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 11% in Ashland.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Ashland vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ashland | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 3 |
White | 91 | 60 |
Asian | 1 | 6 |
Hispanic | 2 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ashland vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Ashland.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 7%, compared to 4% in Ashland.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ashland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ashland | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 21.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.3% |
Depression | 24.6% | 27.9% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 24.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 38.7% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashland vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.2% in Ashland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 24.6% in Ashland.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 20.6% in Ashland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashland at 18.1% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 38.7% in Ashland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Ashland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ashland | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (28) | 4.2% (402) |
High School Diploma | 23.0% (4,380) | 21.6% (2,064) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (2,337) | 28.6% (2,735) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (3,160) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashland vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.1% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 21.6% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 12.3% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.6% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.