Demographics details for Ashland, NE vs Pittsburg, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashland, NE vs Pittsburg, KS.
| Data | Ashland | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,262 | 20,658 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 25.7 years |
| Median Income | $78,966 | $42,371 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Ashland vs Pittsburg
- The population in Pittsburg is higher at 20,658, compared to 3,262 in Ashland.
- Residents in Ashland have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 25.7 years in Pittsburg.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $78,966 compared to $42,371 in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashland at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Pittsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Pittsburg at 23%, compared to 4% in Ashland.
- Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Ashland vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashland | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 92 | 78 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashland vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 78% in Pittsburg.
- Both Ashland and Pittsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 5%, compared to 3% in Ashland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashland and Pittsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashland | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashland vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.8% in Ashland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsburg at 25.0% versus 17.9% in Ashland.
- Pittsburg has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 16.7% in Ashland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashland at 22.4% compared to 19.7% in Pittsburg.
- Pittsburg has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 36.2% in Ashland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsburg at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Ashland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashland | Pittsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (150) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (492) | 13.0% (2,686) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (293) | 5.9% (1,222) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (675) | 17.2% (3,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashland vs Pittsburg
- In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.
- More residents in Ashland have less than a high school education at 9.0% compared to 5.9% in Pittsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 17.2% in Pittsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.