Demographics details for Ashland, NE vs Carthage, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashland, NE vs Carthage, MS.
| Data | Ashland | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,262 | 4,813 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $78,966 | $47,722 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Ashland vs Carthage
- The population in Carthage is higher at 4,813, compared to 3,262 in Ashland.
- Residents in Ashland have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Carthage.
- Ashland has a higher median income of $78,966 compared to $47,722 in Carthage.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashland at 43.0% compared to 23.0% in Carthage.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 15%, compared to 4% in Ashland.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Ashland.
Demographics
Demographics Ashland vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashland | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 45 |
| White | 92 | 36 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ashland vs Carthage
- In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 0% in Ashland.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 36% in Carthage.
- The Asian population is larger in Ashland at 3% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Ashland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ashland at 3% compared to 0% in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ashland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashland | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 15.8% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 21.6% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashland vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.8% in Ashland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 21.6% versus 17.9% in Ashland.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 16.7% in Ashland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ashland at 22.4% compared to 12.5% in Carthage.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 36.2% in Ashland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carthage at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Ashland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashland | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.0% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (492) | 16.7% (806) |
| Less than High School | 9.0% (293) | 16.9% (811) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (675) | 12.1% (583) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashland vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashland.
- In Carthage, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Ashland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 16.9%, compared to 9.0% in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 12.1% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.