Demographics details for Ashfield, MA vs Ponca city, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ashfield, MA vs Ponca city, OK.

Data Ashfield Ponca city
Population 1,734 24,340
Median Age 45.0 years 37.0 years
Median Income $76,000 $51,367
Married Families 70.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 4.4

Population Comparison: Ashfield vs Ponca city

  • The population in Ponca city is higher at 24,340, compared to 1,734 in Ashfield.
  • Residents in Ashfield have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 37.0 years in Ponca city.
  • Ashfield has a higher median income of $76,000 compared to $51,367 in Ponca city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashfield at 70.0% compared to 34.0% in Ponca city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ponca city at 18%, compared to 8% in Ashfield.
  • Ponca city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.0% in Ashfield.

Demographics

Demographics Ashfield vs Ponca city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ashfield Ponca city
Black Data is updating 3
White 97.5 67
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 1.5 9
Two or More Races 1 12
American Indian Data is updating 8

Demographics Comparison: Ashfield vs Ponca city

  • In Ponca city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Ashfield.
  • Ashfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97.5% compared to 67% in Ponca city.
  • In Ponca city, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ashfield.
  • Ponca city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 1.5% in Ashfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ponca city at 12%, compared to 1% in Ashfield.
  • In Ponca city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 0% in Ashfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ashfield Ponca city
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.0%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.6%
Depression Data is updating% 27.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.0%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ashfield vs Ponca city

  • In Ponca city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ponca city at 27.0% versus 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Ponca city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ponca city at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • Ponca city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ponca city at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ashfield Ponca city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (51)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.0% (4,148)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.0% (2,914)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.6% (3,069)

Education Levels Comparison: Ashfield vs Ponca city

  • In Ponca city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • In Ponca city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ponca city at 12.0%, compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
  • In Ponca city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.