Demographics details for Ashfield, MA vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashfield, MA vs Auburn, AL.
Data | Ashfield | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,734 | 80,006 |
Median Age | 45.0 years | 25.9 years |
Median Income | $76,000 | $55,509 |
Married Families | 70.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Ashfield vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 1,734 in Ashfield.
- Residents in Ashfield have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Ashfield has a higher median income of $76,000 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashfield at 70.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 8% in Ashfield.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Ashfield and Auburn at 3.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Ashfield vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ashfield | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 17 |
White | 97.5 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
Hispanic | 1.5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashfield vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Ashfield.
- Ashfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 97.5% compared to 69% in Auburn.
- In Auburn, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Ashfield.
- Auburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1.5% in Ashfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Auburn at 3%, compared to 1% in Ashfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashfield and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ashfield | Auburn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 22.0% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.5% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashfield vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 0.0% in Ashfield.
- Auburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Auburn at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Auburn at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ashfield | Auburn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (236) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.3% (4,206) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (1,964) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashfield vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- In Auburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 5.3% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Auburn at 2.5%, compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
- In Auburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 0.0% in Ashfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.