Demographics details for Asheville, NC vs Wauconda, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Asheville, NC vs Wauconda, IL.
| Data | Asheville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,776 | 13,932 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,810 | $108,229 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Asheville vs Wauconda
- In Asheville, the population is higher at 93,776, compared to 13,932 in Wauconda.
- Residents in Asheville have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.8 years in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher median income of $108,229, compared to $63,810 in Asheville.
- In Wauconda, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Asheville.
- Asheville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Wauconda.
- Wauconda has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Asheville.
Demographics
Demographics Asheville vs Wauconda provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Asheville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 1 |
| White | 78 | 66 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Asheville vs Wauconda
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Asheville at 10% compared to 1% in Wauconda.
- Asheville has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 66% in Wauconda.
- In Wauconda, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Asheville.
- Wauconda has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wauconda at 9%, compared to 5% in Asheville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Asheville and Wauconda at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Asheville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 31.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Asheville vs Wauconda
- More residents in Asheville report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Wauconda.
- Depression is more prevalent in Asheville at 24.9% compared to 18.8% in Wauconda.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Asheville at 14.2% compared to 12.7% in Wauconda.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wauconda at 18.8% compared to 18.6% in Asheville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Asheville at 31.8% compared to 31.0% in Wauconda.
- Disability percentages are higher in Asheville at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Wauconda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Asheville | Wauconda |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (558) | 1.4% (202) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (11,316) | 10.5% (1,456) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (8,074) | 10.2% (1,425) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (36,494) | 26.0% (3,623) |
Education Levels Comparison: Asheville vs Wauconda
- In Wauconda, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Asheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 10.5% in Wauconda.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wauconda at 10.2%, compared to 8.6% in Asheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 26.0% in Wauconda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.