Demographics details for Asheville, NC vs Mcpherson, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Asheville, NC vs Mcpherson, KS.
Data | Asheville | Mcpherson |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,776 | 13,865 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 36.2 years |
Median Income | $63,810 | $69,807 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Asheville vs Mcpherson
- In Asheville, the population is higher at 93,776, compared to 13,865 in Mcpherson.
- Residents in Asheville have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.2 years in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $63,810 in Asheville.
- In Mcpherson, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 32.0% in Asheville.
- Asheville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
- The unemployment rate in Asheville is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.
Demographics
Demographics Asheville vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Asheville | Mcpherson |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 2 |
White | 78 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Asheville vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Asheville at 10% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 78% in Asheville.
- Both Asheville and Mcpherson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Asheville and Mcpherson at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Asheville at 5% compared to 4% in Mcpherson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Asheville and Mcpherson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Asheville | Mcpherson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.7% |
Depression | 24.9% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 14.2% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Asheville vs Mcpherson
- More residents in Asheville report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.2% in Mcpherson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Asheville at 24.9% compared to 20.1% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Asheville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Asheville at 18.6% compared to 18.2% in Mcpherson.
- Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 31.8% in Asheville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Asheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Asheville | Mcpherson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (558) | 0.3% (48) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (11,316) | 12.8% (1,775) |
Less than High School | 8.6% (8,074) | 5.8% (804) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (36,494) | 21.7% (3,010) |
Education Levels Comparison: Asheville vs Mcpherson
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Mcpherson.
- In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 12.1% in Asheville.
- More residents in Asheville have less than a high school education at 8.6% compared to 5.8% in Mcpherson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 21.7% in Mcpherson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.