Demographics details for Asheville, NC vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Asheville, NC vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Asheville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,776 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,810 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Asheville vs Gallatin
- In Asheville, the population is higher at 93,776, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- Residents in Asheville have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $63,810 in Asheville.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Asheville.
- Asheville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Asheville is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Asheville vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Asheville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 15 |
| White | 78 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Asheville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 10% in Asheville.
- Asheville has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Asheville.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 5% in Asheville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Asheville and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Asheville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Asheville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.6% in Asheville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 24.9% in Asheville.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 14.2% in Asheville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Asheville at 18.6% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 31.8% in Asheville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Asheville at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Asheville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (558) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (11,316) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (8,074) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (36,494) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Asheville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Asheville.
- In Gallatin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 12.1% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 8.6% in Asheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 19.6% in Gallatin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.