Demographics details for Asheville, NC vs Chapman, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Asheville, NC vs Chapman, KS.
| Data | Asheville | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,776 | 1,371 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,810 | $66,964 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Asheville vs Chapman
- In Asheville, the population is higher at 93,776, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
- The median age in Chapman is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 40.5 years in Asheville.
- Chapman has a higher median income of $66,964, compared to $63,810 in Asheville.
- In Chapman, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 32.0% in Asheville.
- Asheville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Chapman.
- The unemployment rate in Asheville is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.
Demographics
Demographics Asheville vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Asheville | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Asheville vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Asheville at 10% compared to 0% in Chapman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chapman at 81% compared to 78% in Asheville.
- In Chapman, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Asheville.
- Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 5% in Asheville.
- In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Asheville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Asheville | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Asheville vs Chapman
- In Chapman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 15.6% in Asheville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Asheville at 24.9% compared to 21.4% in Chapman.
- Chapman has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Asheville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chapman at 20.2% compared to 18.6% in Asheville.
- Chapman has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 31.8% in Asheville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Asheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Asheville | Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (558) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (11,316) | 12.3% (168) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (8,074) | 5.1% (70) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (36,494) | 15.5% (212) |
Education Levels Comparison: Asheville vs Chapman
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
- In Chapman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 12.1% in Asheville.
- More residents in Asheville have less than a high school education at 8.6% compared to 5.1% in Chapman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.