Demographics details for Asheville, NC vs Burns, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Asheville, NC vs Burns, KS.
| Data | Asheville | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,776 | 237 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,810 | $43,125 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Asheville vs Burns
- In Asheville, the population is higher at 93,776, compared to 237 in Burns.
- Residents in Asheville have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Asheville has a higher median income of $63,810 compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Asheville at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is identical in both Asheville and Burns at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Asheville is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Asheville vs Burns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Asheville | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | Data is updating |
| White | 78 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Asheville vs Burns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Asheville at 10% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burns at 92% compared to 78% in Asheville.
- The Asian population is larger in Asheville at 1% compared to 0% in Burns.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Asheville and Burns at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Asheville at 5% compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Asheville and Burns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Asheville | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 14.2% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Asheville vs Burns
- More residents in Asheville report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Depression is more prevalent in Asheville at 24.9% compared to 21.2% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Asheville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burns at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Asheville.
- Burns has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 31.8% in Asheville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Burns at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Asheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Asheville | Burns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (558) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (11,316) | 13.9% (33) |
| Less than High School | 8.6% (8,074) | 43.0% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (36,494) | 6.3% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Asheville vs Burns
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- In Burns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 12.1% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Burns at 43.0%, compared to 8.6% in Asheville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Asheville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.