Demographics details for Ashburn, GA vs White house, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashburn, GA vs White house, TN.
| Data | Ashburn | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,174 | 14,516 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $35,987 | $85,404 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Ashburn vs White house
- The population in White house is higher at 14,516, compared to 4,174 in Ashburn.
- Residents in Ashburn have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 36.5 years in White house.
- White house has a higher median income of $85,404, compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- In White house, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in White house.
- The unemployment rate in Ashburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.4% in White house.
Demographics
Demographics Ashburn vs White house provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashburn | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 71 | 2 |
| White | 22 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashburn vs White house
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashburn at 71% compared to 2% in White house.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in White house at 87% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- In White house, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ashburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ashburn at 5% compared to 4% in White house.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in White house at 6%, compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashburn and White house at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashburn | White house |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashburn vs White house
- More residents in Ashburn report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.5% in White house.
- Higher depression rates are seen in White house at 27.6% versus 21.2% in Ashburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashburn at 24.2% compared to 17.7% in White house.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in White house at 16.7% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashburn at 43.3% compared to 32.5% in White house.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in White house.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashburn | White house |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (8) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (791) | 18.0% (2,617) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (875) | 12.4% (1,794) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (304) | 15.4% (2,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashburn vs White house
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ashburn and White house at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in White house.
- More residents in Ashburn have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 12.4% in White house.
- In White house, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.