Demographics details for Ashburn, GA vs Girdletree, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashburn, GA vs Girdletree, MD.
Data | Ashburn | Girdletree |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,174 | 122 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 57.4 years |
Median Income | $35,987 | $129,167 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 50.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Ashburn vs Girdletree
- In Ashburn, the population is higher at 4,174, compared to 122 in Girdletree.
- The median age in Girdletree is higher at 57.4 years, compared to 39.9 years in Ashburn.
- Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167, compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- In Girdletree, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The unemployment rate in Ashburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
Demographics
Demographics Ashburn vs Girdletree provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ashburn | Girdletree |
---|---|---|
Black | 71 | Data is updating |
White | 22 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashburn vs Girdletree
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashburn at 71% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Girdletree at 89% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- In Girdletree, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Ashburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ashburn at 5% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ashburn at 2% compared to 0% in Girdletree.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashburn and Girdletree at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ashburn | Girdletree |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.6% |
Depression | 21.2% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 18.7% |
Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 18.8% |
Obesity | 43.3% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashburn vs Girdletree
- More residents in Ashburn report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.7% in Girdletree.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashburn at 21.2% compared to 20.8% in Girdletree.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashburn at 24.2% compared to 18.7% in Girdletree.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashburn at 43.3% compared to 39.6% in Girdletree.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ashburn | Girdletree |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (8) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (791) | 44.3% (54) |
Less than High School | 21.0% (875) | 19.7% (24) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (304) | 5.7% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashburn vs Girdletree
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.
- In Girdletree, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 44.3% compared to 19.0% in Ashburn.
- More residents in Ashburn have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 19.7% in Girdletree.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.