Demographics details for Ashburn, GA vs Falling waters, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ashburn, GA vs Falling waters, WV.

Data Ashburn Falling waters
Population 4,174 2,150
Median Age 39.9 years 32.2 years
Median Income $35,987 $84,038
Married Families 30.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Ashburn vs Falling waters

  • In Ashburn, the population is higher at 4,174, compared to 2,150 in Falling waters.
  • Residents in Ashburn have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038, compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ashburn at 30.0% compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • Ashburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Falling waters.
  • The unemployment rate in Ashburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Falling waters.

Demographics

Demographics Ashburn vs Falling waters provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ashburn Falling waters
Black 71 6
White 22 92
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 5 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ashburn vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashburn at 71% compared to 6% in Falling waters.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falling waters at 92% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
  • Both Ashburn and Falling waters have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Ashburn at 5% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • Both Ashburn and Falling waters have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 2%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashburn and Falling waters at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ashburn Falling waters
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 16.1% 11.9%
Depression 21.2% 25.7%
Smoking 24.2% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 12.1% 15.2%
Obesity 43.3% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ashburn vs Falling waters

  • More residents in Ashburn report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.5% in Falling waters.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falling waters at 25.7% versus 21.2% in Ashburn.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ashburn at 24.2% compared to 18.7% in Falling waters.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falling waters at 15.2% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ashburn at 43.3% compared to 37.6% in Falling waters.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falling waters at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Ashburn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ashburn Falling waters
No Schooling 0.2% (8) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.0% (791) 22.4% (482)
Less than High School 21.0% (875) 4.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.3% (304) 11.0% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Ashburn vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 19.0% in Ashburn.
  • More residents in Ashburn have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 4.7% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.