Demographics details for Ashburn, GA vs Cedar hill, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashburn, GA vs Cedar hill, TX.
| Data | Ashburn | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,174 | 48,341 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $35,987 | $84,132 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Ashburn vs Cedar hill
- The population in Cedar hill is higher at 48,341, compared to 4,174 in Ashburn.
- Residents in Ashburn have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.3 years in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher median income of $84,132, compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- In Cedar hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Cedar hill.
- Cedar hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Ashburn.
Demographics
Demographics Ashburn vs Cedar hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashburn | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 71 | 51 |
| White | 22 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashburn vs Cedar hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashburn at 71% compared to 51% in Cedar hill.
- Ashburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 22% compared to 11% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Ashburn.
- Cedar hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 5% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar hill at 9%, compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashburn and Cedar hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashburn | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashburn vs Cedar hill
- More residents in Ashburn report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.1% in Cedar hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ashburn at 21.2% compared to 20.5% in Cedar hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashburn at 24.2% compared to 14.8% in Cedar hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar hill at 17.7% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashburn at 43.3% compared to 35.9% in Cedar hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Cedar hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashburn | Cedar hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (8) | 1.2% (578) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (791) | 13.4% (6,465) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (875) | 10.2% (4,909) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (304) | 18.4% (8,890) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashburn vs Cedar hill
- In Cedar hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 13.4% in Cedar hill.
- More residents in Ashburn have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 10.2% in Cedar hill.
- In Cedar hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.