Demographics details for Ashburn, GA vs Burleson, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ashburn, GA vs Burleson, TX.
| Data | Ashburn | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,174 | 53,381 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $35,987 | $87,312 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Ashburn vs Burleson
- The population in Burleson is higher at 53,381, compared to 4,174 in Ashburn.
- Residents in Ashburn have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312, compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- In Burleson, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Burleson.
- The unemployment rate in Ashburn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Burleson.
Demographics
Demographics Ashburn vs Burleson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ashburn | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 71 | 5 |
| White | 22 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ashburn vs Burleson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ashburn at 71% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Burleson at 66% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- In Burleson, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Ashburn.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Burleson at 10%, compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ashburn and Burleson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ashburn | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.1% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 33.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ashburn vs Burleson
- More residents in Ashburn report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.5% in Burleson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Burleson at 23.3% versus 21.2% in Ashburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ashburn at 24.2% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ashburn at 43.3% compared to 33.0% in Burleson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ashburn at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ashburn | Burleson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (8) | 0.7% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (791) | 14.5% (7,733) |
| Less than High School | 21.0% (875) | 7.0% (3,744) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (304) | 16.7% (8,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ashburn vs Burleson
- In Burleson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ashburn hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 14.5% in Burleson.
- More residents in Ashburn have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
- In Burleson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.