Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Yakima, WA.
| Data | Ash fork | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 97,012 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $55,734 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Ash fork have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $55,734 in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 79 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Yakima
- In Yakima, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- In Yakima, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 15% in Ash fork.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yakima at 23.6% versus 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (1,748) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 13.4% (12,983) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 27.9% (27,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Yakima, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 23.6% in Ash fork.
- In Yakima, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.