Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Sacramento, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Sacramento, CA.
| Data | Ash fork | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 528,001 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $78,954 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Sacramento
- The population in Sacramento is higher at 528,001, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Ash fork have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $78,954 in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Sacramento at 12%, compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- Sacramento has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Sacramento provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 12 |
| White | 79 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 19 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the Asian population stands at 19%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- Sacramento has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 13% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ash fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Sacramento
- More residents in Ash fork report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ash fork at 21.4% compared to 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Sacramento has higher obesity rates at 32.7% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Sacramento |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (14,512) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 11.7% (62,039) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 14.7% (77,760) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 24.4% (128,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Sacramento
- In Sacramento, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ash fork hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
- In Sacramento, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.