Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Phillipsburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Phillipsburg, OH.
| Data | Ash fork | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 496 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $56,250 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Phillipsburg
- The population in Phillipsburg is higher at 496, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- Residents in Ash fork have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 33.6 years in Phillipsburg.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $56,250 in Phillipsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 31.0% in Phillipsburg.
- Ash fork has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Phillipsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Ash fork is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Phillipsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Phillipsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Phillipsburg
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ash fork and Phillipsburg at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Phillipsburg at 96% compared to 79% in Ash fork.
- Both Ash fork and Phillipsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ash fork at 6% compared to 4% in Phillipsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 0% in Phillipsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ash fork and Phillipsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Phillipsburg
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Ash fork and Phillipsburg at 18.4%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Phillipsburg at 26.6% versus 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Phillipsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Phillipsburg at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Phillipsburg has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Phillipsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Phillipsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 16.9% (84) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 10.1% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 9.1% (45) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Phillipsburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ash fork and Phillipsburg at 0.0%.
- In Phillipsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 10.1% in Phillipsburg.
- In Phillipsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.1% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.