Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Oakesdale, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Oakesdale, WA.
| Data | Ash fork | Oakesdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 393 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 45.8 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $70,333 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Oakesdale
- In Ash fork, the population is higher at 466, compared to 393 in Oakesdale.
- The median age in Oakesdale is higher at 45.8 years, compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $70,333 in Oakesdale.
- In Oakesdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 50.0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Oakesdale.
- The unemployment rate in Ash fork is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Oakesdale.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Oakesdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Oakesdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 79 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Oakesdale
- In Oakesdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 74% in Oakesdale.
- Both Ash fork and Oakesdale have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ash fork at 6% compared to 5% in Oakesdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakesdale at 17%, compared to 15% in Ash fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ash fork and Oakesdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Oakesdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 28.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Oakesdale
- More residents in Ash fork report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Oakesdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oakesdale at 28.0% versus 21.4% in Ash fork.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 11.5% in Oakesdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakesdale at 18.6% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Oakesdale has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Oakesdale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Oakesdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 8.4% (33) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 12.5% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 18.8% (74) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Oakesdale
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ash fork and Oakesdale at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ash fork hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 8.4% in Oakesdale.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 12.5% in Oakesdale.
- In Oakesdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.