Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Ash fork | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Ho ho kus
- The population in Ho ho kus is higher at 4,216, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $79,861 in Ash fork.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 50.0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Ash fork is higher at 4.1%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 79 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Ho ho kus
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Ash fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ash fork and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Ash fork report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ash fork at 21.4% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Ash fork at 19.3% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Ash fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Ash fork at 30.6% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Ash fork at 26.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Ho ho kus
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ash fork and Ho ho kus at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ash fork hold a high school diploma at 13.1% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.