Demographics details for Ash fork, AZ vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ash fork, AZ vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Ash fork | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 466 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $79,861 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Ash fork vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 28,017, compared to 466 in Ash fork.
- The median age in Greenville is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 38.6 years in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher median income of $79,861 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ash fork at 50.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 10% in Ash fork.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.1% in Ash fork.
Demographics
Demographics Ash fork vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ash fork | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 87 |
| White | 79 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ash fork vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 0% in Ash fork.
- Ash fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ash fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ash fork at 6% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ash fork at 15% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ash fork and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ash fork | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 30.6% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ash fork vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Ash fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ash fork at 21.4% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 19.3% in Ash fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ash fork at 15.9% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 30.6% in Ash fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 26.0% in Ash fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ash fork | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 13.1% (61) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 23.6% (110) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (41) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ash fork vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Ash fork.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.1% in Ash fork.
- More residents in Ash fork have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 8.8% in Ash fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.